European enterprises are under growing pressure: digitization, AI adoption and stricter compliance rules are transforming how IT teams operate. The glue holding all of this together? Integration platforms (iPaaS).
But choosing the right iPaaS is no longer just about connecting systems. It’s about ensuring compliance with GDPR, supporting hybrid IT environments, enabling business agility, and preparing for AI-native workflows.
So, what are the best iPaaS platforms for European businesses in 2025?
Here’s a breakdown of the modern integration landscape — and how the leading options compare.
Digital transformation in Europe is entering a new era. With AI adoption accelerating, compliance tightening (GDPR, NIS2, DORA) and legacy IT systems still deeply embedded into the business, the pressure on CIOs and IT leaders has never been greater.
At the heart of this transformation lies a simple but critical challenge: how to integrate everything seamlessly: cloud apps, ERP systems, on-prem databases, APIs, IoT and now AI agents.
This is where integration platforms as a service (iPaaS) step in. Once considered “middleware,” they have now become the nervous system of modern enterprises, making sure data flows securely, processes stay connected, and businesses remain agile.
But not all iPaaS platforms are built with the same DNA. For European businesses, the requirements go far beyond just connecting apps. They demand:
With these needs in mind, let’s explore the best integration platforms for European enterprises in 2025, with a deep dive into how Frends compares to major competitors like Boomi, MuleSoft, Workato, Microsoft, SAP, SnapLogic, Jitterbit, and Zapier.
To understand the strengths and weaknesses of today’s iPaaS vendors, it helps to zoom out and look at the journey of integration technology over the last two decades.
1st Generation: Point-to-Point Integrations (2000s)
The early 2000s were defined by custom-coded, point-to-point connections. Every time two systems needed to talk, developers wrote brittle, one-off scripts. This worked for a handful of integrations, but as the number of systems exploded, maintenance became a nightmare. Costs ballooned, and IT was stuck firefighting breakages instead of driving strategy.
2nd Generation: Enterprise Service Bus (2010s)
The ESB era brought centralization. Instead of dozens of spaghetti connections, everything flowed through a central hub. This improved governance and monitoring, but came at the expense of agility. ESBs were heavy, slow to implement, and often locked into on-premise infrastructure, which left them struggling as cloud adoption surged.
3rd Generation: Cloud-Native iPaaS (2020s)
The rise of SaaS applications created demand for lighter, faster integration platforms. iPaaS solutions like Boomi, MuleSoft, and Workato offered pre-built connectors, visual designers and cloud scalability. Suddenly, integration was no longer only an IT function — business users could drag and drop their way to connecting apps. But this came with trade-offs: many platforms were cloud-only (unsuited for Europe’s hybrid IT reality), lacked deep compliance features, and often introduced “black box” automation with limited transparency.
4th Generation: AI-Powered iPaaS (2025 and beyond)
We are now entering the fourth wave: AI-native integration. This goes beyond adding copilots or AI mapping assistants. Instead, agentic AI systems are emerging with integrations that can learn, adapt, self-heal, and even be designed in natural language. For example, Frends’ Agentic AI enables CIOs to safely embed AI agents into BPMN workflows with full audit trails and reasoning logs. This matters especially in regulated industries, where explainability and compliance aren’t optional.
Most European organizations today are caught between generations 3 and 4. They still rely heavily on hybrid environments (mixing legacy ERP, on-prem databases, and SaaS apps), but they also want to explore AI-powered automation. This means:
They need today’s platforms to solve for complexity and compliance — not just connect cloud apps but also modernize 20-year-old systems without rewrites.
They need tomorrow’s platforms to be AI-ready — providing explainable, agentic automation that CIOs trust enough to move pilots into production.
In other words, Europe doesn’t just need more automation. It needs smarter, safer and future-proof integration. That’s where the next wave of iPaaS is being defined.
Frends is built in the Nordics with a European-first mindset. Unlike US competitors, it was designed from the ground up around GDPR, data residency and hybrid deployment.
Best for: European enterprises balancing hybrid IT, compliance, and ERP complexity
Key capabilities:
Hybrid deployment: on-premises, cloud, or hybrid
Visual process designer with developer-level flexibility
Built-in GDPR compliance and European data residency
Strong ERP and legacy system integration (SAP, Dynamics, Salesforce, Oracle, etc.)
Enterprise-grade security, governance, and monitoring
Transparent pricing (often 30–50% lower than established iPaaS)
Strengths:
Hybrid flexibility — supports both legacy systems and modern APIs
Compliance-first — critical for regulated industries (finance, healthcare, public sector)
Real-time + batch processing
Deep B2B/EDI capabilities — especially relevant in manufacturing and supply chains
Limitations:
Smaller global ecosystem vs. US leaders
Fewer pre-built connectors than some competitors
Boomi (formerly Dell Boomi) is one of the oldest names in the iPaaS market. Its AtomSphere platform offers broad coverage of integration needs, from API management to B2B/EDI.
Best for: Enterprises with strong cloud-first strategies and budget for managed services
Strengths:
Well-balanced platform covering multiple integration needs
Large partner ecosystem and marketplace
Covers integration, API management and master data management
Strong cloud-native architecture and performance
Limitations:
Can be overly complex for simple integration needs
Pricing can escalate quickly with increased usage
Limited hybrid and on-premises deployment flexibility
Steeper learning curve for advanced features
MuleSoft’s Anypoint Platform is built around API-led connectivity, making it a leader in governance and lifecycle management.
Best for: Large enterprises with dedicated integration teams and deep Salesforce investment
Strengths:
Industry-leading API management and governance
Strong Salesforce integration
Flexible deployment options (cloud, on-prem, hybrid)
Deep monitoring and analytics
Limitations:
Very high cost and complexity for most organizations
Steep learning curve requiring specialized expertise
Overkill for simple integration requirements
Requires significant technical resources for implementation
Workato markets itself as both integration and automation — with AI-powered “recipes” and thousands of connectors.
Best for: Fortune 500 companies with large budgets seeking AI-powered automation and extensive third-party integrations
Strengths:
1000+ pre-built connectors and integrations
Recipe-based visual development approach
AI-powered automation (Workbot) and intelligent document processing
Enterprise security and compliance features
Limitations:
Very high cost (>$100k typical enterprise spend)
Primarily cloud-focused with limited on-premises options
Steep learning curve despite “recipes”
Best for: Analytics-heavy organizations
Strengths:
Excellent data integration and pipeline capabilities
Strong self-service capabilities for business users
Good performance for data-intensive workloads
Focus on analytics and data science use cases
Limitations:
Less focus on business process automation
Limited workflow and orchestration capabilities
Can be complex for non-data integration use cases
Best for: Enterprises fully invested in SAP ERP
Strengths:
Deep SAP-to-SAP and SAP-to-third-party integrations
Event-driven integration
Strong compliance
Limitations:
High complexity and cost
Primarily SAP-focused
Less usable for non-SAP systems
Best for: Companies needing powerful integration at a competitive price
Strengths:
Flexible deployment options, including hybrid
User-friendly for technical users
Limitations:
Best for: Small businesses and non-technical users
Strengths:
7,000+ app integrations
Easy “if-this-then-that” logic
Great for marketing and ops teams
Limitations:
Not enterprise-ready — lacks compliance and governance
Expensive at scale
Poor fit for hybrid/ERP
Feature / Platform | Frends (European iPaaS) | Boomi | MuleSoft | SAP Integration Suite | Zapier | Workato | Jitterbit | SnapLogic |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AI Capabilities | ✅ Agentic AI orchestration: embed AI agents into BPMN workflows with audit trails, reasoning logs, and compliance | ⚠️ Early AI copilots, mostly for mapping & monitoring, limited governance | ⚠️ AI-assisted mapping + monitoring, but no explainability or governance | ⚠️ AI embedded into SAP stack, limited flexibility outside ecosystem | ⚠️ AI task suggestions, but no enterprise governance | ✅ Strong AI copilots (“Workbot”), intelligent doc processing, but governance still limited | ⚠️ Basic AI mapping & monitoring, little beyond automation assistance | ✅ AI-powered data pipelines, predictive optimization, good for analytics use cases |
Hybrid Deployment | ✅ Cloud + On-prem + Hybrid (strong for regulated industries) | ✅ Hybrid possible | ✅ Runtime Fabric enables hybrid, but complex | ✅ SAP on-prem + cloud | ⚠️ Cloud-only | ⚠️ Cloud-first, limited hybrid | ✅ Cloud + on-premises flexibility | ✅ Cloud-native, some hybrid options |
Data & Workflow Integration | ✅ Strong ERP, legacy, and EDI support | ✅ Wide connector library | ✅ Strong API-led design | ✅ Deep SAP ERP integration | ⚠️ App-to-app only | ✅ 1000+ prebuilt connectors, recipe-based automation | ✅ Good ERP, EDI, B2B support, strong mapping features | ✅ Excellent for data pipelines & analytics-driven workflows |
Compliance & Governance | ✅ Built-in GDPR, full auditability, role-based access, reasoning logs | ⚠️ Enterprise security, but governance setup complex | ✅ Strong governance, but high complexity | ✅ Strong for SAP compliance-heavy industries | ❌ Minimal | ⚠️ Governance present but complex, best in enterprise context | ⚠️ Basic governance, less advanced than MuleSoft or SAP | ⚠️ Governance focused on data pipelines, not full workflow governance |
Ease of Use (Business Users) | ✅ Visual workflows + citizen integrator friendly | ✅ Drag-and-drop | ⚠️ Steep learning curve, developer-heavy | ⚠️ Complex, SAP developer-centric | ✅ Very easy, no-code | ✅ Recipe-based, friendly for business users | ⚠️ More technical, but manageable | ✅ Self-service tools for data & analytics teams |
Scalability | ✅ Scales from mid-market to enterprise | ✅ Enterprise-grade | ✅ Enterprise-grade | ✅ Enterprise-grade | ⚠️ Limited for enterprise | ✅ Enterprise-ready, widely adopted in Fortune 500 | ✅ Mid-market to enterprise, good scaling | ✅ Strong for data-heavy enterprises, scalable pipelines |
Pricing Model | 💶 Transparent, typically 30–50% less than premium US vendors | 💶 Usage-based, can escalate quickly | 💶 High-end, $20k+ annually | 💶 Enterprise-level, expensive | 💶 Cheap for SMB, expensive at scale | 💶 High enterprise pricing, typically $10k+/yr plus usage | 💶 Competitive pricing, ~$5k+/yr, more affordable than MuleSoft/Workato | 💶 Usage-based, varies by data volume, can scale fast |
Best Fit | European enterprises needing AI-ready, hybrid, compliant integration | Mid-market to enterprise cloud adopters | Large enterprises (esp. Salesforce-heavy) | SAP-first enterprises | SMBs needing quick fixes | Fortune 500s with budget for premium AI-driven automation | Mid-market enterprises needing ERP & B2B integration | Data-driven orgs prioritizing analytics & AI pipelines |
European CIOs should weigh:
Compliance & sovereignty – Does it respect GDPR and local residency?
Hybrid flexibility – Can it bridge legacy and modern systems?
Cost model – Transparent vs. “per task” pricing traps
AI readiness – Can it scale into agentic AI?
Ecosystem fit – Does it align with your ERP/CRM stack?
The next leap is Agentic AI — integration systems that learn, adapt, and fix themselves.
Frends is taking a security-first, enterprise-focused approach to AI with:
Self-healing integrations that resolve errors automatically
Natural language design for workflows
Explainable AI actions with audit trails
Human-in-the-loop governance
GDPR-compliant AI deployment
This ensures AI in integration isn’t just hype, but solves real business pain points, removes siloes, and delivers measurable ROI.
Choose Frends if you’re a European enterprise needing a cost-effective hybrid, compliant iPaaS with strong ERP/legacy integration and safe, AI-powered workflows.
Choose Boomi if you want a balanced, cloud-first platform with strong partner ecosystem.
Choose MuleSoft if you’re a large Salesforce-heavy enterprise with deep API requirements (and budget).
Choose Workato if you want AI-heavy automation and have the scale to justify premium pricing.
Choose SAP Integration Suite if SAP is your digital core.
Choose SnapLogic or Jitterbit for specific mid-market or data-heavy needs.
Choose Zapier if you’re a small business needing simple SaaS automation.
The integration platform you pick today will shape your digital transformation, compliance readiness and AI adoption for the next decade.